Wall Street Journal Swings Left

Wall Street Journal Swings Left

While the WSJ’s editorial page retains some semblance of conservatism, the body of the paper continues to move left, following much of the media.

The July 11, 2017, WSJ article on Australia’s energy problems, emphasized the role of the LNG industry in causing Australia’s energy problems while ignoring the real causes of Australia’s problems, which are, the energy policies adopted by the Labor and Liberal parties.

These energy policies had three critically important results:

  1. Expanding wind and solar energy to the exclusion of using fossil fuels, by using subsidies to underpin the development of wind farms
  2. Closing coal-fired power plants to stop CO2 emissions
  3. Prohibiting the development of natural gas in the Southeast portions of Australia, primarily New South Wales and South Australia

These are the three real causes of Australia’s energy problems, not the actions of industry in developing Australia’s LNG exports.

The blackout in South Australia that left the entire province without electricity for more than 24 hours was caused by too great a reliance on wind energy, coupled with the closing of the areas last coal-fired power plant.

The 2014 report issued by the Australian Energy Market Operator Ltd (which operates the national energy market) & Electranet (which operates the national electricity transmission grid) predicted that South Australia would suffer blackouts if it continued with its decarbonization policies.

South Australia Without Electricity

The Hazelwood, Victoria, 1,600 MW coal-fired power plant is also being closed, removing 20% of Victoria’s baseload capacity and 5% of Australia’s.

In spite of the obvious problems, the Labor government in South Australia continues to push wind energy with a goal of having wind provide 50% of the province’s electricity.

Now that industry is laying off workers and closing plants because of the lack of low-cost natural gas, the national government is taking action … But the actions are short sighted if the real causes of Australia’s energy disaster aren’t addressed.

At the national level, the Liberal Party, under Prime Minister Turnbull, has enacted legislation to curtail exports unless the LNG industry brings natural gas to those parts of Australia that lack sufficient supplies.

While these regulations may be needed in the short term, and are politically expedient, they will only exacerbate Australia’s energy problems unless the root causes are addressed, i.e., too much wind and solar, too few coal-fired power plants and not allowing the development of new natural gas supplies in those parts of Australia lacking sufficient supplies.

On my trip to Australia in February, our group met with former Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who, in his talk and Q&A sessions, made it clear that Australia’s energy problems were rooted in a misguided effort to cut CO2 emissions coupled with deliberately ignoring Australia’s huge resources of coal and natural gas.

His views are essentially summarized by the three problems cited above.

Greenpeace and other extreme environmental groups have successfully imbued Ausrtralians with a fear of global warming from CO2 emissions. Greenpeace has, for example, campaigned to close coal-fired power plants.

As far back as 2011 Greenpeace, with the generous support of the Rockefeller Family Fund, proposed “A strategy to disrupt the Australian Coal Boom.”

They have obviously had considerable success.

These are the facts about Australia’s predicament that should be reported by the media, not a hit-piece about the selfish, money-grubbing intransigence of the LNG industry.

This isn’t the first time the Wall Street Journal has abandoned conservative positions.

The media’s misrepresentation of facts is becoming a national disgrace.

It’s becoming clear that Australia, rather than Germany, could become the poster child for the harmful effects of renewables. See, Blackout Race Underway



Please follow and like us:

2 Replies to “Wall Street Journal Swings Left”

  1. You know I really don’t “care” what South Australia does. I think living in California they need to lead the way into the effects of high cost and unreliable power. They are a good example what is in store if you follow the recommendations of “Greenpeace”, far left, and alarmists who have the power to do so. Perhaps SA will become the poster child of the consequences if the story is ever told by the MSM and there is a worry about the direction Wall Street Journal is headed.

    • Thanks for your comment.
      I appologize for taking so long to reply to it, but still am trying to geetthe enw system to work properly.
      Yes. South Austratlia is a poster child for what is instore for us if we follow the Governor Brown’s of this world.