Banks Agree: No more Coal-fired Power Plants

Banks Agree: No more Coal-fired Power Plants

COP26 has reached an agreement that will condemn millions of people in poor, developing countries to live in poverty and die an early death.

These are mostly non-white people, and since race seems to be of primary importance to elite Europeans and Americans, that fact shouldn’t go unmentioned.

Quoting an article from the Wall Street Journal:

“Most of the world’s big banks, its major investors and insurers and its financial regulators have for the first time signed up to a coordinated pledge that will incorporate carbon emissions into their most fundamental decisions.”

And:

“Financial regulators, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, plus the global-accounting-standards organization, have agreed to add their own oversight to the system through reviews and disclosure standards.”

A new international body is being established to enforce the making of the right decarbonization investments.

Some of these institutions have already said they won’t invest in coal-fired power plants or coal mining.

From a report by Morgan Stanley:

“Around 220 institutional investors representing some $57 trillion in assets have already committed to align their portfolios with net-zero. In addition, 88 banks, representing a third of global banking assets, have promised to decarbonize their lending and investment portfolios, in line with the net zero ambition.”

This means millions will continue to live without electricity and to having to use wood and dung for cooking. Dung, just to be clear, is the waste products, i.e., manure, from animals. 

Supposedly, developed countries will provide billions for investing in wind and solar farms in developing countries.

Will these banks also invest in hydrogen production in countries that already don’t have enough electricity to supply even minimum amounts of electricity to their citizens?

And how will developing countries get along with battery-powered vehicles when they don’t have enough electricity to light their homes for just a few hours every day?

Has anyone been to Samarang, Indonesia, or cities in India and Africa to see how people move around and how goods are transported?

Battery-powered motor bikes and three-wheeled jitneys don’t work very well without electricity.

The media will declare COP 26 a success, but will the three or four billion poor people of color living in developing nations agree?

. . .

 

(103)

Please follow and like us:

7 Replies to “Banks Agree: No more Coal-fired Power Plants”

  1. Why do you think that Hydrogen offers some promise as an energy distribution medium? It has lousy thermodynamic and hydrodynamic properties for this service. Much of the energy content will be consumed by compressing and pipeline shipping of this gas. And current pipelines are not likely to work because of leakage problems. And trucking offers not hope. It will take over 20 semis of compressed gas shipments to deliver to one “gas” station the same amount of energy that a single gasoline tanker does today.

    • I agree with your comments. Hydrogen is no panacea. It’s being promoted by the EU and other climate alarmists, and would be needed in Africa if net-zero policies were widely adopted. Obviously, there isn’t enough electricity in Africa today to allow any of it to be used to produce hydrogen.

  2. Pingback: Looking at 2021 in a nutshell – Some View on the World

  3. Pingback: Beyond Contempt: | ajmarciniak

  4. Pingback: Beyond Contempt: Bankers Back Net-Zero & Condemn World’s Poorest to Eternal Poverty – Climate- Science.press

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.